@glen what is your opinion on how to implement functions that have multiple signatures, like eigs and say format?
math.eigs(x)
math.eigs(x, precision)
math.mean(a, b, c, ...)
math.…
Sorry for the delay, I was sick.
I've briefly gone though the current set of functions of mathjs. Some observations:
- Most functions are either a function with a clear API that can be…
ah, yeah, you're right. So, yes, the alternative is to come up with an API specifying individual parameters again, like Dependencies<'add', [T, T]>.
I'm ok with the syntax of both…
I've pushed a branch approach4.6
I've tried an additional API like `DependencyAlias<'addComplex', 'add', Complex<numbe…
Thanks, this makes sense. Agree
The following notation reads very clear to me:
{addComplex: Signature<'add', Complex<number>>,
addNumbers: Signature<'add', number>}
We…
Good summary. Agree, lets work this out in revision 4.6.
About aliases: thinking aloud here. In some cases, like say add…
This is a bit of the "opposite" of what we tried in #123: there, we where trying to make typed(...) return a full-fledged TS interface.…
😂 you're getting poetic.
I like the approaches 4.5 and 2.5 a lot, thanks! Feels like we're getting there. Let's discuss today in a video call.