Start sketching ideas about separation and unification
parent
ee6276f926
commit
4868a50f2a
1 changed files with 24 additions and 0 deletions
24
Elements-and-observables.md
Normal file
24
Elements-and-observables.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
|||
## Separation
|
||||
|
||||
Elements don't interact directly with each other, and constraints don't interact directly with each other either. In other words, the graph of direct interactions among elements and constraints is bipartite.
|
||||
|
||||
### Contrasts
|
||||
|
||||
Elements | Observables
|
||||
---|---
|
||||
Naturally seen as geometric objects | Naturally seen as quantities
|
||||
No notion of valence; can interact with any number of constraints | Many important observables have fixed valence
|
||||
An assembly consisting entirely of elements seems meaningful and potentially useful | An assembly consisting entirely of observables seems hard to interpret
|
||||
|
||||
***To do:** Expand and clarify list of contrasts.*
|
||||
|
||||
## Unification
|
||||
|
||||
Can we realize constraints as geometric objects? For example:
|
||||
|
||||
* A real angle constraint might be seen as a pair of infinitesimal ribbons crossing at a fixed angle along a circle
|
||||
* An imaginary angle constraint might be seen as a circle that passes perpendicularly through a pair of spheres, with a fixed cross ratio.
|
||||
|
||||
Maybe being subject to a constraint can then be seen as a kind of incidence.
|
||||
|
||||
***To do:** Explore ideas for unifying elements and observables in spite of the contrasts described above.*
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue