Clean up the outline view #19
@ -61,12 +61,12 @@ summary.selected {
|
||||
background-color: #444;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
summary > div, .cst {
|
||||
summary > div, .constraint {
|
||||
padding-top: 4px;
|
||||
padding-bottom: 4px;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
.elt, .cst {
|
||||
.elt, .constraint {
|
||||
display: flex;
|
||||
flex-grow: 1;
|
||||
padding-left: 8px;
|
||||
@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ details[open]:has(li) .elt-switch::after {
|
||||
flex-grow: 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
.cst-label {
|
||||
.constraint-label {
|
||||
flex-grow: 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -107,26 +107,26 @@ details[open]:has(li) .elt-switch::after {
|
||||
width: 56px;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
.cst {
|
||||
.constraint {
|
||||
font-style: italic;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
.cst.invalid {
|
||||
.constraint.invalid {
|
||||
glen marked this conversation as resolved
Outdated
|
||||
color: #f58fc2;
|
||||
glen marked this conversation as resolved
Outdated
glen
commented
I don't really mind I don't really mind `#222` and `#f0f0f0` sort of thing for various greys, because they are pretty easy to understand, but my mental hex-to-hue converter is otherwise not particularly good. Colors also often carry semantic content and/or play specific roles. So please don't use non-grey bare hex colors in css. Give them symbolic names that convey role (presuming there is one) and/or hue as well if feasible (or if not, comment the hue where the symbol is defined) and then use them symbolically, presumably with `var(...)` CSS references. For example, in Numberscope several colors are defined in App.vue and then used throughout the components with `var(...)` references. Thanks.
Vectornaut
commented
Done (in commit Done (in commit 0c8022d). I've named the color variables according to their roles, with cues about the intended color limited to brightness descriptions. There are comments describing the colors on the lines where the color variables are defined. I'm hoping that this will make it easier to keep the color descriptions up to date with the actual colors.
glen
commented
Those are excellent symbolic names and comments. If we are ever pulling in an external package that has css variables of its own, we will need to add a prefix (e.g., --text-bright becomes --dyna-text-bright), but they're good for now. Those are excellent symbolic names and comments. If we are ever pulling in an external package that has css variables of its own, we will need to add a prefix (e.g., --text-bright becomes --dyna-text-bright), but they're good for now.
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
.cst > input[type=checkbox] {
|
||||
.constraint > input[type=checkbox] {
|
||||
margin: 0px 8px 0px 0px;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
.cst > input[type=text] {
|
||||
.constraint > input[type=text] {
|
||||
color: inherit;
|
||||
background-color: inherit;
|
||||
border: 1px solid #555;
|
||||
border-radius: 2px;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
.cst.invalid > input[type=text] {
|
||||
.constraint.invalid > input[type=text] {
|
||||
border-color: #70495c;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -44,12 +44,12 @@ fn ConstraintOutlineItem(constraint_key: ConstraintKey, element_key: ElementKey)
|
||||
};
|
||||
let other_subject_label = assembly.elements.with(|elts| elts[other_subject].label.clone());
|
||||
let class = constraint.lorentz_prod_valid.map(
|
||||
|&lorentz_prod_valid| if lorentz_prod_valid { "cst" } else { "cst invalid" }
|
||||
|&lorentz_prod_valid| if lorentz_prod_valid { "constraint" } else { "constraint invalid" }
|
||||
);
|
||||
view! {
|
||||
li(class=class.get()) {
|
||||
input(r#type="checkbox", bind:checked=constraint.active)
|
||||
div(class="cst-label") { (other_subject_label) }
|
||||
div(class="constraint-label") { (other_subject_label) }
|
||||
LorentzProductInput(constraint=constraint)
|
||||
div(class="status")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
CSS class names, like variable names, should ideally be self-documenting. The class
.cst
doesn't say anything to me. Ideally, choose a different class name with clearer semantics. If that's not feasible for some reason, make sure to clearly comment the first use of the.cst
class.Done! I've expanded "cst" to "constraint," "elt" to "element," and "rep" to "representation" in the HTML element classes (commits
882286c
and3f3c173
).Yes, much more intelligible! Thanks, resolving.