StudioInfinity/dyna3
2
0
Fork 1
Code Issues 44 Pull requests Projects 2 Releases 2 Wiki Activity Actions

Generalize constraints to observables #48

Merged
glen merged 25 commits from Vectornaut/dyna3:observables_on_main into main 2025-03-10 23:43:25 +00:00
Conversation 69 Commits 25 Files changed 7 +2 -9
2 changed files with 2 additions and 9 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files
Showing only changes of commit b9db7a5699 - Show all commits

5
app-proto/src/add_remove.rs
View file

@ -4,10 +4,7 @@ use web_sys::{console, wasm_bindgen::JsValue};
use crate::{ use crate::{
engine, engine,
AppState, AppState,
assembly::{ assembly::{Assembly, Element}
Assembly,
Element
}
}; };
glen marked this conversation as resolved
glen commented 2025-03-08 00:23:06 +00:00
Review
Copy link

In assembly.rs, you put all of the sub-namespaces under a top-level item on a single line, like

    assembly::{Assembly, Element}

whereas here this has been spread across three lines. They should be consistent in format. If it's the same to you, I prefer a formats that balances the desire for fewer linebreaks (to keep a good amount of information visible on screen at one time) with the need for clear organization and readability (which too few linebreaks can engender). That is, I prefer the assembly.rs format.

In assembly.rs, you put all of the sub-namespaces under a top-level item on a single line, like ``` assembly::{Assembly, Element} ``` whereas here this has been spread across three lines. They should be consistent in format. If it's the same to you, I prefer a formats that balances the desire for fewer linebreaks (to keep a good amount of information visible on screen at one time) with the need for clear organization and readability (which too few linebreaks can engender). That is, I prefer the assembly.rs format.
Vectornaut commented 2025-03-08 23:30:50 +00:00
Review
Copy link

In assembly.rs, you put all of the sub-namespaces under a top-level item on a single line […], whereas here this has been spread across three lines. They should be consistent in format.

Good catch. My convention has been to start with each use declaration on one line. If that line gets too long, I switch the outermost braced list from space-separated to newline-separated. Then I do the same thing recursively at lower list levels. The use declarations you noticed break this convention; I've corrected them In commit b9db7a5. I think the convention is followed everywhere else, but I'll keep an eye on it whenever I revise use declarations in future commits.

> In assembly.rs, you put all of the sub-namespaces under a top-level item on a single line […], whereas here this has been spread across three lines. They should be consistent in format. Good catch. My convention has been to start with each `use` declaration on one line. If that line gets too long, I switch the outermost braced list from space-separated to newline-separated. Then I do the same thing recursively at lower list levels. The `use` declarations you noticed break this convention; I've corrected them In commit b9db7a5. I think the convention is followed everywhere else, but I'll keep an eye on it whenever I revise `use` declarations in future commits.
/* DEBUG */ /* DEBUG */

6
app-proto/src/outline.rs
View file

@ -9,11 +9,7 @@ use web_sys::{
use crate::{ use crate::{
AppState, AppState,
assembly, assembly,
assembly::{ assembly::{ElementKey, Regulator, RegulatorKey},
ElementKey,
Regulator,
RegulatorKey
},
specified::SpecifiedValue specified::SpecifiedValue
}; };