Start discussing the modified Cholesky decomposition
parent
c64fdfa7ae
commit
85668021c5
1 changed files with 3 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -87,3 +87,6 @@ _To be added_
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Modified Cholesky decomposition
|
#### Modified Cholesky decomposition
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Recall from [above](#Review) that once we express the first and second derivatives of $f$ as a vector $F^{(1)}_p \in \mathbb{R}^n$ and a matrix $F^{(2)}_p \in \operatorname{End}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ with respect to a computational basis $\mathbb{R}^n \to V$, we can find the Newton step $v$ at $p$ by solving the equation $F^{(1)}_p + F^{(2)}_p v = 0$. More abstractly, if we express the first and second derivatives of $f$ as a vector $\tilde{F}^{(1)}_p \in V$ and an operator $\tilde{F}^{(2)}_p \in \operatorname{End}(V)$ with respect to a chosen inner product on $V$, as discussed [above](#Uniform_regularization), we can find the Newton step by solving the equation $\tilde{F}^{(1)}_p + \tilde{F}^{(2)}_p v = 0$. When $f^{(2)}_p$ is positive-definite, taking the Cholesky decomposition of $\tilde{F}^{(2)}_p$ with respect to the standard inner product on $\mathbb{R}^n$ provides an efficient and numerically stable solution method. Since the Newton step doesn’t depend on the choice of inner product, we typically use the inner product given by the computational basis.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
_To be continued, citing [NW, §3.4]_
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue